🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is pursuing compensation valued at $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This move is a clear response by the Kremlin against proposals to use immobilized Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

Based on reports in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority filed a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

EU leaders are set to decide later this week on a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and financial stability.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary custodian for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

EU authorities have argued that their proposal is legally sound. Their position is based on the fact that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in EU countries shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened reciprocal measures, such as confiscating EU corporate assets within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, a figure who has assumed a key role in peace negotiations, wrote on X that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He added that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to comment on the new lawsuit. It has in the past stated it is facing more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While judges in EU countries are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian courts, analysts expect Moscow to pursue enforcement in nations with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, if such assets can be located," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are working on steps to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are designing safeguards to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

Under the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Ukraine would only be obligated to repay the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Alternative Proposals

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to fund a loan, backed by unused funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the reparations loan as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is equally important," she stated. "It also sends a powerful message that when you cause all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."